Kamala Harris has faced her fair share of political turbulence, but recently, the spotlight has been on some eyebrow-raising personal controversies. Her husband, Doug Emhoff, has drawn criticism for his past legal work defending questionable corporate clients, stirring up a wave of negative headlines.
And let’s not forget Harris’ stepdaughter, Ella Emhoff, who’s made waves for her eccentric behavior in the public eye, from sporting unconventional fashion choices at formal events to bizarre social media posts. It’s a family affair that seems to reflect the chaos surrounding Harris herself.
But Harris’ problems aren’t just limited to family drama. According to Chris Rufo, a bombshell report revealed that the Vice President was caught plagiarizing in her 2009 book. But wait, it wasn’t just once. Turns out, plagiarism might be a habit for Harris, and her troubles go back even further than anyone thought.
There’s more to this story, and it’s a pattern that’s been playing out for years. Ready for the kicker? She’s been lifting text not just from random sources but even from a Republican colleague. Let’s dive into the latest scandal that’s making waves.
From Daily Wire:
A recent report from Christopher Rufo detailed the parts of Vice President Kamala Harris‘ 2009 book that appear to have been plagiarized — but according to a new report from The Washington Free Beacon, the story doesn’t end there.A new report from the Free Beacon’s Aaron Sibarium showed that in 2007 — while she was the San Francisco District Attorney — Harris lifted text from a Republican state attorney and then presented it as her own when testifying before Congress on a loan repayment program for prosecutors.
More Than One Slip-Up: Harris’ Plagiarism Problem
According to a recent report from The Washington Free Beacon, Harris didn’t just plagiarize in her 2009 book—she’s been at it for years. In fact, back in 2007, while she was serving as the San Francisco District Attorney, she reportedly plagiarized text from a Republican state attorney.
Aaron Sibarium of The Free Beacon dropped the bombshell that Harris copied significant portions of her Congressional testimony from Paul Logli, a district attorney from Winnebago County, Illinois. Logli had testified months earlier on the same issue, and Harris lifted almost his entire statement, making minor tweaks here and there.
What makes this even more shocking is the level of detail she copied. Not only did Harris use the same arguments and language as Logli, but she also repeated his typos—yes, the same missing punctuation and mistaken plurals appeared in her testimony too. It’s one thing to borrow ideas, but to copy-paste someone else’s work, typos and all? That’s next-level lazy.
And the cherry on top? She even corrected one grammatical error that Logli had made, swapping a “who” for a “whom.” Guess that’s what counts as originality in Harris’ world.
But it doesn’t stop there. Sibarium uncovered a disturbing trend of plagiarism throughout Harris’ career. In 2012, while serving as California’s attorney general, she copied a fictionalized story about a victim of sex trafficking from a nonprofit’s website and presented it as a real case.
The story, posted by the Polaris Project, was meant for informational purposes, not to be passed off as actual testimony. Yet, Harris took it and ran with it, presenting it as if she had first-hand knowledge of the incident. It’s not just one or two slip-ups—it’s a pattern of dishonesty that raises serious questions about her credibility.
A Career Built on Copying?
Sibarium’s findings don’t just paint a picture of occasional plagiarism—they suggest that Harris has made a habit of borrowing other people’s work throughout her career. From Congress to the courtroom, it seems she’s been lifting words without attribution for years.
Nearly 1,200 of the 1,500 words Harris submitted in her testimony matched Logli’s statement verbatim. Let that sink in—she didn’t just crib a few lines, she copied almost the entire thing.
And the plagiarism in her 2009 book? That’s just the tip of the iceberg. As the story gains traction, commentators on the right have been quick to point out the irony. Matt Walsh sarcastically remarked that Harris has now fully embraced Biden’s legacy, saying, “A plagiarized speech and now she is Truly Biden.”
The comparison to Biden’s infamous 1988 plagiarism scandal is almost too perfect. Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro quipped, “She wasn’t content stealing his 2024 nomination, she’s now stealing his 1988 campaign.”
But beyond the jokes, this raises serious questions about Harris’ integrity. If she’s willing to lift entire testimonies and fictionalized stories without batting an eye, what else has she borrowed throughout her career? And more importantly, how much of her political persona is truly her own?
Key Takeaways
- Kamala Harris is mired in plagiarism scandals dating back to at least 2007, with significant portions of her work lifted from others without credit.
- This isn’t just a one-time mistake. Harris has a long history of borrowing text, from Congressional testimony to fictionalized stories, presenting them as her own work.
- The pattern of dishonesty raises serious concerns about Harris’ credibility and integrity, as the Vice President faces growing scrutiny from both sides of the political spectrum.
Source: Daily Wire