Americans are growing increasingly frustrated with the ongoing border crisis. Have you noticed how communities across the nation continue to suffer from unchecked illegal immigration? Criminal gangs with international ties haven’t just established footholds—they’re terrorizing cities and towns nationwide. Indeed, the damage to public safety is downright alarming.

These vicious MS-13 and Tren de Aragua gang members aren’t simply “undocumented immigrants” as the mainstream media loves to call them. Indeed, they’re dangerous criminals who have no business being on American soil.

President Donald Trump took bold action this week. He invoked the Alien Enemies Act to begin deporting hundreds of illegal alien gang members from the notorious Tren de Aragua and MS-13 gangs. Both organizations have now been officially designated as terrorist organizations. Nearly 300 gang members were successfully loaded onto planes headed for El Salvador.

The operation represented exactly what Trump promised during his campaign – swift, decisive action to protect American citizens from foreign threats operating within our borders.

The successful deportation operation, however, quickly encountered resistance from an all-too-familiar source. Isn’t it remarkable how quickly liberal judges step in whenever someone tries to actually enforce our immigration laws?

Obama-Appointed Judge Blocks President’s Authority

Judge James E. Boasberg, appointed by former President Barack Obama, issued a temporary restraining order blocking President Trump from using the Alien Enemies Act. The judge’s order came after the deportation planes had already landed in El Salvador. You read that right—the planes had already delivered these criminals to their home country.

The left-wing American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Soros-linked Democracy Forward were behind the lawsuit that prompted Boasberg’s ruling. These organizations sued on behalf of five illegal aliens accused of gang membership to halt the deportations. Notice how these Soros-funded groups always seem to have unlimited resources when it comes to defending the “rights” of non-citizens?

Representative Brandon Gill (R-TX) took immediate action in response to what he viewed as judicial overreach. He filed Articles of Impeachment against Judge Boasberg, whose family reportedly has deep ties to Democrats.

“The purpose of Judge Boasberg’s unconstitutional ruling is to tie up President Trump’s time and resources in litigation, stopping him from executing on the democratic mandate voters gave him,” Gill stated. “The ruling is a fundamental attack on our democratic system.”

Rep. Gill Takes Constitutional Stand

Gill’s impeachment effort represents a rare but serious constitutional challenge to judicial overreach. His Articles of Impeachment specifically cite Boasberg’s attempt to interfere with the executive branch’s deportation authority.

“Judge Boasberg directing deportation flights to turn around midair and return to the United States is tantamount to a Circuit Court Judge directing troop movements abroad or directing the Executive how to conduct foreign policy. It’s illegal and unconstitutional. Time to impeach,” Gill wrote when announcing the impeachment articles.

The White House responded forcefully to Boasberg’s order. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered a clear rebuke.

“A single judge in a single city cannot direct the movements of an aircraft carrier full of foreign alien terrorists who were physically expelled from U.S. soil,” she said.

Leavitt further emphasized the constitutional principles at stake, noting that “the Supreme Court has repeatedly made clear — federal courts generally have no jurisdiction over the President’s conduct of foreign affairs, his authorities under the Alien Enemies Act, and his core Article II powers.”

The last successful impeachment of a federal judge occurred in 2010, when G. Thomas Porteous Jr., appointed by President Bill Clinton, was removed from office for accepting bribes and making false statements under penalty of perjury.

I’ve seen this pattern play out repeatedly—unelected judges substituting their political preferences for the will of the American people. It has to stop.

The Bottom Line

This constitutional showdown highlights the ongoing battle between presidential authority and judicial activism. President Trump was elected with a clear mandate to secure the border and protect Americans from criminal aliens. A single judge’s attempt to block this mandate raises serious questions about the separation of powers.

The involvement of Soros-funded organizations in the legal challenge reveals the coordinated opposition to Trump’s immigration enforcement agenda. These well-funded groups consistently prioritize the interests of illegal aliens over the safety of American citizens.

Americans should watch closely as Rep. Gill’s impeachment effort moves forward. The Constitution grants the President unique authority in matters of national security and foreign affairs. When it comes to protecting Americans from foreign threats, no judge should have the power to substitute their political preferences for the President’s constitutional authority.

Key Takeaways:

• Rep. Brandon Gill filed impeachment articles against Judge Boasberg for blocking Trump’s deportation of illegal alien gang members.
• The judge’s ruling came after a lawsuit from the ACLU and Soros-linked Democracy Forward on behalf of illegal aliens.
• The White House forcefully rejected the judge’s authority, stating courts have no jurisdiction over presidential foreign affairs powers.
• This case highlights the ongoing battle between executive authority and judicial activism in border security matters.

Source: Breitbart